AECOM Common Stock (ACM)

Competitors to AECOM Common Stock (ACM)

Fluor Corporation 

Fluor and AECOM are engaged in similar markets, including infrastructure and energy, offering diverse services such as engineering, procurement, and construction. Fluor has distinguished itself with its strong presence in the global energy sector, capitalizing on large-scale energy projects, which allows it to leverage established relationships with major industrial clients. While AECOM also operates in this sector, Fluor's specialized focus and expertise give it a competitive advantage in securing energy-related contracts. However, AECOM's diverse service offerings and strategic partnerships allow it to compete effectively in various sectors outside of energy.

Jacobs Engineering Group 

Jacobs and AECOM compete primarily in engineering, architecture, and construction management services. Both firms offer a wide range of services across multiple sectors, including infrastructure, buildings, and environmental solutions. Jacobs has a strong focus on technology and digital integration in its projects, allowing it to deliver innovative solutions that enhance project efficiency and sustainability, which may provide it with a competitive edge. In contrast, AECOM has a larger global footprint and extensive portfolio, positioning it well in large-scale projects, particularly in urban development and government contracts.

Kiewit Corporation

Kiewit Corporation operates in the same domain as AECOM, providing construction and project management services. Kiewit is known for its strong performance in heavy civil construction and its ability to execute large projects efficiently. Their commitment to safety, quality, and cost management often gives them a competitive edge in bidding for projects. While AECOM offers broader consulting and design capabilities, Kiewit's robust construction expertise and experience in managing complex projects position it favorably in sectors where on-ground execution is paramount, although AECOM's integrated solutions could appeal to clients seeking multi-disciplinary services.

Skanska

Skanska, a global leader in construction and development, competes with AECOM in the infrastructure sector, focusing on sustainable construction practices and green building initiatives. Both companies have a strong emphasis on environmental stewardship, but Skanska's strong commitment to sustainability and innovation in construction methods gives it a distinct advantage when it comes to projects that prioritize eco-friendliness. AECOM, while also committed to sustainability, has a wider array of engineering services, which means it may appeal to clients looking for holistic solutions rather than just construction, allowing both companies to effectively cater to different market segments.

WSP Global Inc.

WSP Global and AECOM are prominent players in engineering consulting and project delivery, with both firms providing comprehensive services that include design, engineering, and environmental consulting. WSP has been aggressive in expanding its capabilities through acquisitions, thereby enhancing its expertise and market reach, particularly in the infrastructure and transportation sectors. This strategic growth affords WSP a robust competitive edge in specializing and delivering high-quality, innovative solutions. Comparatively, AECOM's established global presence and its wide-ranging service offerings allow it to compete effectively, although it may face challenges in segments where WSP has established deeper specialized expertise.